The Director of National Intelligence defends the NSA's attacks against anonymous networks. From
Allthingsd:
The National Security Agency may have attempted to penetrate and
compromise a widely used network designed to protect the anonymity of
its users, but it was only because terrorists and criminals use it, too.
That’s the explanation from Director of National Intelligence James
Clapper about the recently disclosed attacks by the NSA and its
companion agency in the U.K. against The Onion Router, or Tor, a network
that uses a constantly changing list of specially configured servers to
relay and anonymize the Internet traffic of its users.
In a statement posted to the DNI’s blog,
Clapper acknowledged NSA’s “interest in tools used to facilitate
anonymous online communication.” However, media coverage of the work
fails to point out that “the Intelligence Community’s interest in online
anonymity services and other online communication and networking tools
is based on the undeniable fact that these are the tools our adversaries
use to communicate and coordinate attacks against the United States and
our allies.”
Perhaps that may sound reasonable, until you realize that by "our adversaries" the NSA basically means EVERYONE, including all US citizens. Recall
this piece from the Guardian:
Since 2011, the total spending on Sigint enabling has topped $800m.
The program "actively engages US and foreign IT industries to covertly
influence and/or overtly leverage their commercial products' designs",
the document states. None of the companies involved in such partnerships
are named; these details are guarded by still higher levels of
classification.
Among other things, the program is designed to
"insert vulnerabilities into commercial encryption systems". These would
be known to the , but to no one else, including ordinary customers, who are tellingly referred to in the document as "adversaries".
The NSA is the man in the middle . . .
